activity
20132023
most citedGoogle Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories

2k citations · 4k across the 40 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2018Show all

10 papers · 1 filter

cs.DL2018★ 21 cited

Do the technical universities exhibit distinct behaviour in global university rankings? A Times Higher Education (THE) case study

Carmen Perez-Esparrells, Enrique Orduna-Malea

Technical Universities (TUs) exhibit a distinct ranking performance in comparison with other universities. In this paper we identify 137 TUs included in the THE Ranking (2017 editi…

cs.DL2018★ 2k cited

Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories

Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Mike Thelwall +1

Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely consulted by researchers and sometimes used in research evaluations, there is no rec…

cs.DL2018

Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment

Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín

The launch of Google Scholar (GS) marked the beginning of a revolution in the scientific information market. This search engine, unlike traditional databases, automatically indexes…

cs.DL2018

Google Scholar: the 'big data' bibliographic tool

Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Alberto Martin-Martin +1

The launch of Google Scholar back in 2004 meant a revolution not only in the scientific information search market but also in research evaluation processes. Its dynamism, unparalle…

cs.DL2018★ 32 cited

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics

Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar

This article describes a procedure to generate a snapshot of the structure of a specific scientific community and their outputs based on the information available in Google Scholar…

cs.DL2018★ 185 cited

Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?

Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Anne-Wil Harzing +1

The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly-cited documents through Google Scholar is feasible and reliable. To this end, we carrie…

cs.DL2018★ 17 cited

The lost academic home: institutional affiliation links in Google Scholar Citations

Enrique Orduña-Malea, Juan M. Ayllón, Alberto Martín-Martín +1

This paper analyzes the new affiliation feature available in Google-Scholar Citations revealing that the affiliation-tool works well for most-institutions, it is unable to detect a…

cs.DL2018★ 47 cited

Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community

Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar

The new web-based academic communication platforms do not only enable researchers to better advertise their academic outputs, making them more visible than ever before, but they al…

cs.DL2018★ 58 cited

Dimensions: re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information

Enrique Orduna-Malea, Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar

The overarching aim of this work is to provide a detailed description of the free version of Dimensions (new bibliographic database produced by Digital Science and launched in Janu…

cs.DL2018★ 195 cited

Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison

Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar

This study explores the extent to which bibliometric indicators based on counts of highly-cited documents could be affected by the choice of data source. The initial hypothesis is…