activity
20102022
most citedImproving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?

758 citations · 1.8k across the 31 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

34 papers

cs.HC2022★ 2 cited

Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desiderata

Amy K. Heger, Liz B. Marquis, Mihaela Vorvoreanu +2

Data is central to the development and evaluation of machine learning (ML) models. However, the use of problematic or inappropriate datasets can result in harms when the resulting…

cs.LG2022★ 29 cited

REAL ML: Recognizing, Exploring, and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research

Jessie J. Smith, Saleema Amershi, Solon Barocas +2

Transparency around limitations can improve the scientific rigor of research, help ensure appropriate interpretation of research findings, and make research claims more credible. D…

cs.AI2021★ 12 cited

Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support

Michael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam +2

Various tools and practices have been developed to support practitioners in identifying, assessing, and mitigating fairness-related harms caused by AI systems. However, prior resea…

stat.ML2021★ 1 cited

Doubly Non-Central Beta Matrix Factorization for DNA Methylation Data

Aaron Schein, Anjali Nagulpally, Hanna Wallach +1

We present a new non-negative matrix factorization model for bounded-support data based on the doubly non-central beta (DNCB) distribution, a generalization of the beta dis…

cs.AI2021★ 3 cited

From Human Explanation to Model Interpretability: A Framework Based on Weight of Evidence

David Alvarez-Melis, Harmanpreet Kaur, Hal Daumé +2

We take inspiration from the study of human explanation to inform the design and evaluation of interpretability methods in machine learning. First, we survey the literature on huma…

cs.CY2021★ 2 cited

Designing Disaggregated Evaluations of AI Systems: Choices, Considerations, and Tradeoffs

Solon Barocas, Anhong Guo, Ece Kamar +5

Disaggregated evaluations of AI systems, in which system performance is assessed and reported separately for different groups of people, are conceptually simple. However, their des…

cs.CL2020

Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLP

Su Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé +1

We survey 146 papers analyzing "bias" in NLP systems, finding that their motivations are often vague, inconsistent, and lacking in normative reasoning, despite the fact that analyz…

cs.CL2020

On the Relationships Between the Grammatical Genders of Inanimate Nouns and Their Co-Occurring Adjectives and Verbs

Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell, Lawrence Wolf-Sonkin +2

We use large-scale corpora in six different gendered languages, along with tools from NLP and information theory, to test whether there is a relationship between the grammatical ge…

cs.CY2019★ 235 cited

Measurement and Fairness

Abigail Z. Jacobs, Hanna Wallach

We propose measurement modeling from the quantitative social sciences as a framework for understanding fairness in computational systems. Computational systems often involve unobse…

cs.LG2019★ 8 cited

Weight of Evidence as a Basis for Human-Oriented Explanations

David Alvarez-Melis, Hal Daumé, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan +1

Interpretability is an elusive but highly sought-after characteristic of modern machine learning methods. Recent work has focused on interpretability via , w…

cs.CL2019

Quantifying the Semantic Core of Gender Systems

Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell, Lawrence Wolf-Sonkin +2

Many of the world's languages employ grammatical gender on the lexeme. For example, in Spanish, the word for 'house' (casa) is feminine, whereas the word for 'paper' (papel) is mas…

stat.ML2019★ 13 cited

Poisson-Randomized Gamma Dynamical Systems

Aaron Schein, Scott W. Linderman, Mingyuan Zhou +2

This paper presents the Poisson-randomized gamma dynamical system (PRGDS), a model for sequentially observed count tensors that encodes a strong inductive bias toward sparsity and…

cs.CY2019★ 5 cited

Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmap

Anhong Guo, Ece Kamar, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan +2

AI technologies have the potential to dramatically impact the lives of people with disabilities (PWD). Indeed, improving the lives of PWD is a motivator for many state-of-the-art A…

cs.CL2019

Unsupervised Discovery of Gendered Language through Latent-Variable Modeling

Alexander Hoyle, Wolf-Sonkin, Hanna Wallach +2

Studying the ways in which language is gendered has long been an area of interest in sociolinguistics. Studies have explored, for example, the speech of male and female characters…

cs.CL2019★ 10 cited

Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphology

Ran Zmigrod, Sabrina J. Mielke, Hanna Wallach +1

Gender stereotypes are manifest in most of the world's languages and are consequently propagated or amplified by NLP systems. Although research has focused on mitigating gender ste…

cs.LG2019★ 36 cited

What's in a Name? Reducing Bias in Bios without Access to Protected Attributes

Alexey Romanov, Maria De-Arteaga, Hanna Wallach +7

There is a growing body of work that proposes methods for mitigating bias in machine learning systems. These methods typically rely on access to protected attributes such as race,…

cs.CL2019★ 5 cited

Combining Sentiment Lexica with a Multi-View Variational Autoencoder

Alexander Hoyle, Lawrence Wolf-Sonkin, Hanna Wallach +2

When assigning quantitative labels to a dataset, different methodologies may rely on different scales. In particular, when assigning polarities to words in a sentiment lexicon, ann…

cs.IR2019★ 296 cited

Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting

Maria De-Arteaga, Alexey Romanov, Hanna Wallach +6

We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. We analyze the…

cs.HC2019★ 758 cited

Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?

Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé +2

The potential for machine learning (ML) systems to amplify social inequities and unfairness is receiving increasing popular and academic attention. A surge of recent work has focus…

stat.ME2018★ 3 cited

The Hyperedge Event Model

Bomin Kim, Aaron Schein, Bruce A. Desmarais +1

We introduce the hyperedge event model (HEM)---a generative model for events that can be represented as directed edges with one sender and one or more receivers or one receiver and…

cs.DB2018

Datasheets for Datasets

Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione +4

The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we…

stat.ML2018★ 14 cited

Locally Private Bayesian Inference for Count Models

Aaron Schein, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Alexandra Schofield +2

We present a general method for privacy-preserving Bayesian inference in Poisson factorization, a broad class of models that includes some of the most widely used models in the soc…

cs.LG2018★ 103 cited

A Reductions Approach to Fair Classification

Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudík +2

We present a systematic approach for achieving fairness in a binary classification setting. While we focus on two well-known quantitative definitions of fairness, our approach enco…

cs.AI2018

Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability

Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman +2

With machine learning models being increasingly used to aid decision making even in high-stakes domains, there has been a growing interest in developing interpretable models. Altho…