activity
20152022
most citedSensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

12 citations · 41 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2018Show all

6 papers · 1 filter

math.ST20181 cited

Rerandomization in Factorial Experiments

Xinran Li, Peng Ding, Donald B. Rubin

With many pretreatment covariates and treatment factors, the classical factorial experiment often fails to balance covariates across multiple factorial effects simultaneously. Ther…

stat.ME2018

Randomization Tests for Weak Null Hypotheses in Randomized Experiments

Jason Wu, Peng Ding

The Fisher randomization test (FRT) is appropriate for any test statistic, under a sharp null hypothesis that can recover all missing potential outcomes. However, it is often sough…

stat.ME2018

Randomization Inference for Peer Effects

Xinran Li, Peng Ding, Qian Lin +2

Many previous causal inference studies require no interference, that is, the potential outcomes of a unit do not depend on the treatments of other units. However, this no-interfere…

math.ST2018

Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with a diverging number of covariates

Lihua Lei, Peng Ding

Randomized experiments have become important tools in empirical research. In a completely randomized treatment-control experiment, the simple difference in means of the outcome is…

stat.AP2018

Using Survival Information in Truncation by Death Problems Without the Monotonicity Assumption

Fan Yang, Peng Ding

In some randomized clinical trials, patients may die before the measurements of their outcomes. Even though randomization generates comparable treatment and control groups, the rem…

stat.ME20186 cited

Causal Inference: A Missing Data Perspective

Peng Ding, Fan Li

Inferring causal effects of treatments is a central goal in many disciplines. The potential outcomes framework is a main statistical approach to causal inference, in which a causal…