activity
20152022
most citedSensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

12 citations · 41 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing stat.MEShow all

14 papers · 1 filter

stat.ME20221 cited

Posterior Predictive Propensity Scores and -Values

Peng Ding, Tianyu Guo

\citet{Rosenbaum83ps} introduced the notion of the propensity score and discussed its central role in causal inference with observational studies. Their paper, however, caused a fu…

stat.ME20212 cited

To adjust or not to adjust? Estimating the average treatment effect in randomized experiments with missing covariates

Anqi Zhao, Peng Ding

Complete randomization allows for consistent estimation of the average treatment effect based on the difference in means of the outcomes without strong modeling assumptions on the…

stat.ME2021

Reconciling design-based and model-based causal inferences for split-plot experiments

Anqi Zhao, Peng Ding

The split-plot design assigns different interventions at the whole-plot and sub-plot levels, respectively, and induces a group structure on the final treatment assignments. A commo…

stat.ME2021

Model-assisted analyses of cluster-randomized experiments

Fangzhou Su, Peng Ding

Cluster-randomized experiments are widely used due to their logistical convenience and policy relevance. To analyze them properly, we must address the fact that the treatment is as…

stat.ME2020

Identification of Causal Effects Within Principal Strata Using Auxiliary Variables

Zhichao Jiang, Peng Ding

In causal inference, principal stratification is a framework for dealing with a posttreatment intermediate variable between a treatment and an outcome, in which the principal strat…

stat.ME2019

Sharp bounds on the relative treatment effect for ordinal outcomes

Jiannan Lu, Yunshu Zhang, Peng Ding

For ordinal outcomes, the average treatment effect is often ill-defined and hard to interpret. Echoing Agresti and Kateri (2017), we argue that the relative treatment effect can be…