works on

From the 1 of 12 linked papers with an AI index.

collaborators

12 papers

cs.AI2026

Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies

Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Andrew Schwartz +21

The paper evaluates whether current AI agents can independently conduct open‑ended AI research by having them attempt to solve the central questions of two unpublished NeurIPS subm…

cs.AI2026

Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench

Nitya Nadgir, Sayash Kapoor, Kangheng Liu +11

When a benchmark's accuracy saturates, it is often retired and replaced with a more challenging version. We show that this approach privileges accuracy and misses the opportunity t…

cs.AI2026

Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability

Stephan Rabanser, Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis +3

AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks. While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in pr…

cs.AI2026

Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities

Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis, Andrew Schwartz +15

Benchmark-based evaluation remains important for tracking frontier AI progress. But it can both overstate and understate deployed capability because it privileges tasks that can be…

cs.AI2026

Log analysis is necessary for credible evaluation of AI agents

Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Stephan Rabanser +8

Agent benchmarks typically report only final outcomes: pass or fail. This threatens evaluation credibility in three ways. First, scores may be inflated or deflated by shortcuts and…

cs.LG2025

What Does It Take to Build a Performant Selective Classifier?

Stephan Rabanser, Nicolas Papernot

Selective classifiers improve model reliability by abstaining on inputs the model deems uncertain. However, few practical approaches achieve the gold-standard performance of a perf…