activity
20242026
collaborators

8 papers

cs.SE2026

Evaluating perturbation robustness of generative systems that use COBOL code inputs

Samuel Ackerman, Wesam Ibraheem, Orna Raz +1

Systems incorporating large language models (LLMs) as a component are known to be sensitive (i.e., non-robust) to minor input variations that do not change the meaning of the input…

cs.SE2025

PACIFIC: a framework for generating benchmarks to check Precise Automatically Checked Instruction Following In Code

Itay Dreyfuss, Antonio Abu Nassar, Samuel Ackerman +5

Large Language Model (LLM)-based code assistants have emerged as a powerful application of generative AI, demonstrating impressive capabilities in code generation and comprehension…

cs.SE2025

Uncovering Code Insights: Leveraging GitHub Artifacts for Deeper Code Understanding

Ziv Nevo, Orna Raz, Karen Yorav

Understanding the purpose of source code is a critical task in software maintenance, onboarding, and modernization. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in generat…

cs.SE2025

Vintage Code, Modern Judges: Meta-Validation in Low Data Regimes

Ora Nova Fandina, Gal Amram, Eitan Farchi +6

Application modernization in legacy languages such as COBOL, PL/I, and REXX faces an acute shortage of resources, both in expert availability and in high-quality human evaluation d…

cs.SE2025

Automated Validation of LLM-based Evaluators for Software Engineering Artifacts

Ora Nova Fandina, Eitan Farchi, Shmulik Froimovich +4

Automation in software engineering increasingly relies on large language models (LLMs) to generate, review, and assess code artifacts. However, establishing LLMs as reliable evalua…

cs.AI2025

How Safe is Your Safety Metric? Automatic Concatenation Tests for Metric Reliability

Ora Nova Fandina, Leshem Choshen, Eitan Farchi +3

Consider a scenario where a harmfulness evaluation metric intended to filter unsafe responses from a Large Language Model. When applied to individual harmful prompt-response pairs,…