8 papers
Position: The Real Barrier to LLM Agent Usability is Agentic ROI
Weiwen Liu, Jiarui Qin, Xu Huang +10
Large Language Model (LLM) agents represent a promising shift in human-AI interaction, moving beyond passive prompt-response systems to autonomous agents capable of reasoning, plan…
ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling
Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng +24
Function calling significantly extends the application boundary of large language models, where high-quality and diverse training data is critical for unlocking this capability. Ho…
Instruction-Tuning Data Synthesis from Scratch via Web Reconstruction
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu +8
The improvement of LLMs' instruction-following capabilities depends critically on the availability of high-quality instruction-response pairs. While existing automatic data synthet…
ToolACE-DEV: Self-Improving Tool Learning via Decomposition and EVolution
Xu Huang, Weiwen Liu, Xingshan Zeng +8
The tool-using capability of large language models (LLMs) enables them to access up-to-date external information and handle complex tasks. Current approaches to enhancing this capa…
Crowd Comparative Reasoning: Unlocking Comprehensive Evaluations for LLM-as-a-Judge
Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Yuxin Jiang +8
LLM-as-a-Judge, which generates chain-of-thought (CoT) judgments, has become a widely adopted auto-evaluation method. However, its reliability is compromised by the CoT reasoning's…
RevisEval: Improving LLM-as-a-Judge via Response-Adapted References
Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Tiezheng YU +9
With significant efforts in recent studies, LLM-as-a-Judge has become a cost-effective alternative to human evaluation for assessing text generation quality in a wide range of task…