11 papers
Reasoning Consensus: Structural Ensembling of LLM Reasoning via Weighted DAG Aggregation
Amruta Parulekar, Jinu Lee, Dilek Hakkani-Tür +1
Large Language Models (LLMs) explore problems through chain-of-thought, but this exploration is buried in unstructured prose. On high-stakes tasks, users cannot tell which steps ar…
Scaling Evaluation-time Compute with Reasoning Models as Evaluators
Seungone Kim, Ian Wu, Jinu Lee +8
The paper studies how using larger, chain‑of‑thought reasoning language models as evaluators—by allocating more test‑time compute—can improve the accuracy of evaluating and reranki…
ReasoningFlow: Discourse Structures for Understanding LLM Reasoning Traces
Jinu Lee, Shivam Agarwal, Amruta Parulekar +3
Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce reasoning traces with non-linear structures, such as backtracking and self-correction, that complicate the evaluation and monitoring of the re…
Global PIQA: Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning Across 100+ Languages and Cultures
Tyler A. Chang, Catherine Arnett, Abdelrahman Sadallah +377
To date, there exist almost no culturally-specific evaluation benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) that cover a large number of languages and cultures. In this paper, we pre…
Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics
Jinu Lee, Kyoung-Woon On, Simeng Han +2
Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains (e.g., law) is essential for ensuring credibility and explainability, yet remains challenging due to the…
Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs
Priyanka Kargupta, Shuyue Stella Li, Haocheng Wang +9
Large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems yet fail on simpler variants, suggesting they achieve correct outputs through mechanisms fundamentally different from human reas…