collaborators

10 papers

cs.SE2026

From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale

Chandra Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, Euna Mehnaz Khan +4

AI coding agents are generating code at volumes that exceed the capacity of traditional peer review. At the same time, existing AI code review tools over-index on low-value suggest…

cs.SE2026

A Preliminary Study on Explaining Risk of Code Changes using LLM-Based Prediction Models

Yalin Liu, Kosay Jabre, Rui Abreu +10

Predictions by machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models are often received skeptically unless they are paired with intelligible explanations. In the context of…

cs.SE2026

Automating Low-Risk Code Review at Meta: RADAR, Risk Calibration, and Review Efficiency

Chris Adams, Arjun Singh Banga, Parveen Bansal +28

AI-assisted coding tools have altered software production. At Meta, significant lines of code per human-landed diff grew by 105.9% year over year and per-developer diff volume rose…

cs.SE2026

DRS-OSS: A Diff-Risk Scoring Tool for Continuous Integration Workflows

Ali Sayedsalehi, Peter C. Rigby, Audris Mockus

Software teams need change-risk scores that can guide continuous integration decisions such as review prioritization, test scheduling, and downstream validation before risky change…

cs.SE2026

AI-Generated Smells: An Analysis of Code and Architecture in LLM and Agent-Driven Development

Yuecai Zhu, Nikolaos Tsantalis, Peter C. Rigby

The promise of Large Language Models in automated software engineering is often measured by functional correctness, overlooking the critical issue of long term maintainability. Thi…

cs.SE2026

Risk-Aware Batch Testing for Performance Regression Detection

Ali Sayedsalehi, Peter C. Rigby, Gregory Mierzwinski

Performance regression testing is essential in large-scale continuous-integration (CI) systems, yet executing full performance suites for every commit is prohibitively expensive. P…