activity
20132026
most citedAdversarial Training Can Hurt Generalization

134 citations · 330 across the 35 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2022Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2022

Margin-based sampling in high dimensions: When being active is less efficient than staying passive

Alexandru Tifrea, Jacob Clarysse, Fanny Yang

It is widely believed that given the same labeling budget, active learning (AL) algorithms like margin-based active learning achieve better predictive performance than passive lear…

cs.LG2022★ 2 cited

How unfair is private learning ?

Amartya Sanyal, Yaxi Hu, Fanny Yang

As machine learning algorithms are deployed on sensitive data in critical decision making processes, it is becoming increasingly important that they are also private and fair. In t…

cs.LG2022

Provable concept learning for interpretable predictions using variational autoencoders

Armeen Taeb, Nicolo Ruggeri, Carina Schnuck +1

In safety-critical applications, practitioners are reluctant to trust neural networks when no interpretable explanations are available. Many attempts to provide such explanations r…

cs.LG2022★ 6 cited

Why adversarial training can hurt robust accuracy

Jacob Clarysse, Julia Hörrmann, Fanny Yang

Machine learning classifiers with high test accuracy often perform poorly under adversarial attacks. It is commonly believed that adversarial training alleviates this issue. In thi…

stat.ML2022

Fast Rates for Noisy Interpolation Require Rethinking the Effects of Inductive Bias

Konstantin Donhauser, Nicolo Ruggeri, Stefan Stojanovic +1

Good generalization performance on high-dimensional data crucially hinges on a simple structure of the ground truth and a corresponding strong inductive bias of the estimator. Even…