activity
20132023
most citedVoting with Random Classifiers (VORACE): Theoretical and Experimental Analysis

25 citations · 47 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

Legal Summarisation through LLMs: The PRODIGIT Project

Thiago Dal Pont, Federico Galli, Andrea Loreggia +3

We present some initial results of a large-scale Italian project called PRODIGIT which aims to support tax judges and lawyers through digital technology, focusing on AI. We have fo…

cs.LG2022

Learning Behavioral Soft Constraints from Demonstrations

Arie Glazier, Andrea Loreggia, Nicholas Mattei +3

Many real-life scenarios require humans to make difficult trade-offs: do we always follow all the traffic rules or do we violate the speed limit in an emergency? These scenarios fo…

cs.AI2022★ 8 cited

When Is It Acceptable to Break the Rules? Knowledge Representation of Moral Judgement Based on Empirical Data

Edmond Awad, Sydney Levine, Andrea Loreggia +6

One of the most remarkable things about the human moral mind is its flexibility. We can make moral judgments about cases we have never seen before. We can decide that pre-establish…

cs.CV2021

Deep ensembles in bioimage segmentation

Loris Nanni, Daniela Cuza, Alessandra Lumini +2

Semantic segmentation consists in classifying each pixel of an image by assigning it to a specific label chosen from a set of all the available ones. During the last few years, a l…

cs.AI2020★ 2 cited

Thinking Fast and Slow in AI

Grady Booch, Francesco Fabiano, Lior Horesh +8

This paper proposes a research direction to advance AI which draws inspiration from cognitive theories of human decision making. The premise is that if we gain insights about the c…

cs.AI2020

Modeling Contrary-to-Duty with CP-nets

Roberta Calegari, Andrea Loreggia, Emiliano Lorini +2

In a ceteris-paribus semantics for deontic logic, a state of affairs where a larger set of prescriptions is respected is preferable to a state of affairs where some of them are vio…

cs.LG2019★ 25 cited

Voting with Random Classifiers (VORACE): Theoretical and Experimental Analysis

Cristina Cornelio, Michele Donini, Andrea Loreggia +2

In many machine learning scenarios, looking for the best classifier that fits a particular dataset can be very costly in terms of time and resources. Moreover, it can require deep…

cs.LG2018★ 5 cited

CPMetric: Deep Siamese Networks for Learning Distances Between Structured Preferences

Andrea Loreggia, Nicholas Mattei, Francesca Rossi +1

Preference are central to decision making by both machines and humans. Representing, learning, and reasoning with preferences is an important area of study both within computer sci…

cs.AI2015★ 1 cited

Logical Conditional Preference Theories

Cristina Cornelio, Andrea Loreggia, Vijay Saraswat

CP-nets represent the dominant existing framework for expressing qualitative conditional preferences between alternatives, and are used in a variety of areas including constraint s…

cs.AI2013★ 2 cited

Restricted Manipulation in Iterative Voting: Convergence and Condorcet Efficiency

Umberto Grandi, Andrea Loreggia, Francesca Rossi +2

In collective decision making, where a voting rule is used to take a collective decision among a group of agents, manipulation by one or more agents is usually considered negative…