activity
20112026
most citedDesigning Fair Ranking Schemes

162 citations · 585 across the 42 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

47 papers

cs.DB2026

Seasoning Data Modeling Education with GARLIC: A Participatory Co-Design Framework

Viktoriia Makovska, Ihor Michurin, Mariia Tokhtamysh +2

Entity-Relationship (ER) modeling is commonly taught as a primarily technical activity, despite its central role in shaping how data systems represent people, processes, and instit…

cs.DB2025★ 3 cited

The Cambridge Report on Database Research

Anastasia Ailamaki, Samuel Madden, Daniel Abadi +43

On October 19 and 20, 2023, the authors of this report convened in Cambridge, MA, to discuss the state of the database research field, its recent accomplishments and ongoing challe…

cs.HC2024

Are Data Experts Buying into Differentially Private Synthetic Data? Gathering Community Perspectives

Lucas Rosenblatt, Bill Howe, Julia Stoyanovich

Data privacy is a core tenet of responsible computing, and in the United States, differential privacy (DP) is the dominant technical operationalization of privacy-preserving data a…

cs.DB2024

Query Refinement for Diverse Top- Selection

Felix S. Campbell, Alon Silberstein, Julia Stoyanovich +1

Database queries are often used to select and rank items as decision support for many applications. As automated decision-making tools become more prevalent, there is a growing rec…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Fairness in Algorithmic Recourse Through the Lens of Substantive Equality of Opportunity

Andrew Bell, Joao Fonseca, Carlo Abrate +2

Algorithmic recourse -- providing recommendations to those affected negatively by the outcome of an algorithmic system on how they can take action and change that outcome -- has ga…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

A New Paradigm for Counterfactual Reasoning in Fairness and Recourse

Lucius E. J. Bynum, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

Counterfactuals and counterfactual reasoning underpin numerous techniques for auditing and understanding artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The traditional paradigm for counterf…

cs.CR2023

A Simple and Practical Method for Reducing the Disparate Impact of Differential Privacy

Lucas Rosenblatt, Julia Stoyanovich, Christopher Musco

Differentially private (DP) mechanisms have been deployed in a variety of high-impact social settings (perhaps most notably by the U.S. Census). Since all DP mechanisms involve add…

cs.LG2023★ 11 cited

Setting the Right Expectations: Algorithmic Recourse Over Time

Joao Fonseca, Andrew Bell, Carlo Abrate +2

Algorithmic systems are often called upon to assist in high-stakes decision making. In light of this, algorithmic recourse, the principle wherein individuals should be able to take…

cs.SI2023★ 23 cited

Social network modeling and applications, a tutorial

Lisette Espín-Noboa, Tiago Peixoto, Fariba Karimi

Social networks have been widely studied over the last century from multiple disciplines to understand societal issues such as inequality in employment rates, managerial performanc…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Privilege: Revisiting Bias-Variance Trade-Offs in the Context of Fair Prediction

Falaah Arif Khan, Julia Stoyanovich

In this paper we revisit the bias-variance decomposition of model error from the perspective of designing a fair classifier: we are motivated by the widely held socio-technical bel…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

The Possibility of Fairness: Revisiting the Impossibility Theorem in Practice

Andrew Bell, Lucius Bynum, Nazarii Drushchak +3

The ``impossibility theorem'' -- which is considered foundational in algorithmic fairness literature -- asserts that there must be trade-offs between common notions of fairness and…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

An Epistemic and Aleatoric Decomposition of Arbitrariness to Constrain the Set of Good Models

Falaah Arif Khan, Denys Herasymuk, Nazar Protsiv +1

Recent research reveals that machine learning (ML) models are highly sensitive to minor changes in their training procedure, such as the inclusion or exclusion of a single data poi…

cs.AI2022

Counterfactuals for the Future

Lucius E. J. Bynum, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

Counterfactuals are often described as 'retrospective,' focusing on hypothetical alternatives to a realized past. This description relates to an often implicit assumption about the…

cs.HC2022

Rankers, Rankees, & Rankings: Peeking into the Pandora's Box from a Socio-Technical Perspective

Jun Yuan, Julia Stoyanovich, Aritra Dasgupta

Algorithmic rankers have a profound impact on our increasingly data-driven society. From leisurely activities like the movies that we watch, the restaurants that we patronize; to h…

cs.CR2022

Epistemic Parity: Reproducibility as an Evaluation Metric for Differential Privacy

Lucas Rosenblatt, Bernease Herman, Anastasia Holovenko +7

Differential privacy (DP) data synthesizers support public release of sensitive information, offering theoretical guarantees for privacy but limited evidence of utility in practica…

cs.CY2022

Towards Substantive Conceptions of Algorithmic Fairness: Normative Guidance from Equal Opportunity Doctrines

Falaah Arif Khan, Eleni Manis, Julia Stoyanovich

In this work we use Equal Oppportunity (EO) doctrines from political philosophy to make explicit the normative judgements embedded in different conceptions of algorithmic fairness.…

cs.CY2022★ 1 cited

Think About the Stakeholders First! Towards an Algorithmic Transparency Playbook for Regulatory Compliance

Andrew Bell, Oded Nov, Julia Stoyanovich

Increasingly, laws are being proposed and passed by governments around the world to regulate Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems implemented into the public and private sectors. M…

cs.DB2022

Temporal graph patterns by timed automata

Amir Pouya Aghasadeghi, Jan Van den Bussche, Julia Stoyanovich

Temporal graphs represent graph evolution over time, and have been receiving considerable research attention. Work on expressing temporal graph patterns or discovering temporal mot…

cs.LG2022★ 5 cited

Spending Privacy Budget Fairly and Wisely

Lucas Rosenblatt, Joshua Allen, Julia Stoyanovich

Differentially private (DP) synthetic data generation is a practical method for improving access to data as a means to encourage productive partnerships. One issue inherent to DP i…

cs.CY2022★ 2 cited

An External Stability Audit Framework to Test the Validity of Personality Prediction in AI Hiring

Alene K. Rhea, Kelsey Markey, Lauren D'Arinzo +5

Automated hiring systems are among the fastest-developing of all high-stakes AI systems. Among these are algorithmic personality tests that use insights from psychometric testing,…

cs.DB2021

Temporal Regular Path Queries

Marcelo Arenas, Pedro Bahamondes, Amir Aghasadeghi +1

In the last decade, substantial progress has been made towards standardizing the syntax of graph query languages, and towards understanding their semantics and complexity of evalua…

cs.LG2021★ 6 cited

Disaggregated Interventions to Reduce Inequality

Lucius E. J. Bynum, Joshua R. Loftus, Julia Stoyanovich

A significant body of research in the data sciences considers unfair discrimination against social categories such as race or gender that could occur or be amplified as a result of…

cs.CY2021★ 4 cited

Fairness as Equality of Opportunity: Normative Guidance from Political Philosophy

Falaah Arif Khan, Eleni Manis, Julia Stoyanovich

Recent interest in codifying fairness in Automated Decision Systems (ADS) has resulted in a wide range of formulations of what it means for an algorithmic system to be fair. Most o…

cs.GT2021

Most Expected Winner: An Interpretation of Winners over Uncertain Voter Preferences

Haoyue Ping, Julia Stoyanovich

It remains an open question how to determine the winner of an election when voter preferences are incomplete or uncertain. One option is to assume some probability space over the v…