works on

From the 1 of 5 linked papers with an AI index.

collaborators

5 papers

econ.GN2026

Publication bias and p-hacking in the effect of COVID-19 on learning

Martina Luskova, Nino Buliskeria, Ali Elminejad +4

We revisit a central estimate in the economics of education: the human-capital loss associated with COVID-19 school closures. Estimates of pandemic learning loss may be affected by…

econ.GN2026

Optimal Inflation Rate: A Meta-Analysis

Matej Opatrny, Martin Opatrny, Tomas Havranek +2

We revisit the optimal long-run inflation rate using 777 estimates from 116 primary studies published between 1989 and 2026, the largest sample on the topic to date. To our knowled…

econ.EM2026

Do decisions about outliers and influential effects matter? Evidence from 358 behavioral science meta-analyses

Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova, Martina Luskova +1

Meta-analysts routinely face estimates that look too large or extreme. Yet, how to handle them is left to the reviewer's judgment. The methods for detecting such estimates are well…

econ.GN2026

Electricity demand has not become more price-responsive despite ninety years of technological change

Peter Kudela, Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova +2

Energy planners have long assumed that electricity demand will grow more price-responsive as metering, automation, and storage spread, an assumption now embedded in decarbonization…

econ.GN2026

Does Multi-Agent Debate Improve AI Feedback on Research Papers?

Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova

The paper evaluates whether multi‑agent debate AI tools provide more useful feedback on economics meta‑analyses than a single‑pass large language model, finding that authors prefer…