activity
20222026
most citedTools at the Frontiers of Quantitative Verification

2 citations · 3 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.SE2026

ATLAS: Discovering Agent Strategies through LLM-Guided Abstraction and Automata Learning

Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Andreas Happe, Jürgen Cito +3

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly used for complex tasks such as software testing and cybersecurity assessment. While these agents demonstrate impressive cap…

cs.LG2026

Explainably Safe Reinforcement Learning

Sabine Rieder, Stefan Pranger, Debraj Chakraborty +2

Trust in a decision-making system requires both safety guarantees and the ability to interpret and understand its behavior. This is particularly important for learned systems, whos…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

Fairness Shields: Safeguarding against Biased Decision Makers

Filip Cano, Thomas A. Henzinger, Bettina Könighofer +2

As AI-based decision-makers increasingly influence human lives, it is a growing concern that their decisions are often unfair or biased with respect to people's sensitive attribute…

cs.LO2024★ 2 cited

Tools at the Frontiers of Quantitative Verification

Roman Andriushchenko, Alexander Bork, Carlos E. Budde +20

The analysis of formal models that include quantitative aspects such as timing or probabilistic choices is performed by quantitative verification tools. Broad and mature tool suppo…

cs.LG2022

Automata Learning meets Shielding

Martin Tappler, Stefan Pranger, Bettina Könighofer +3

Safety is still one of the major research challenges in reinforcement learning (RL). In this paper, we address the problem of how to avoid safety violations of RL agents during exp…