5 papers · 1 filter
Don't blame me: How Intelligent Support Affects Moral Responsibility in Human Oversight
Cedric Faas, Richard Uth, Sarah Sterz +2
AI-based systems can increasingly perform work tasks autonomously. In safety-critical tasks, human oversight of these systems is required to mitigate risks and to ensure responsibi…
Design Considerations for Human Oversight of AI: Insights from Co-Design Workshops and Work Design Theory
Cedric Faas, Sophie Kerstan, Richard Uth +2
As AI systems become increasingly capable and autonomous, domain experts' roles are shifting from performing tasks themselves to overseeing AI-generated outputs. Such oversight is…
On the Complexities of Testing for Compliance with Human Oversight Requirements in AI Regulation
Markus Langer, Veronika Lazar, Kevin Baum
Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requi…
What Makes for a Good Saliency Map? Comparing Strategies for Evaluating Saliency Maps in Explainable AI (XAI)
Felix Kares, Timo Speith, Hanwei Zhang +1
Saliency maps are a popular approach for explaining classifications of (convolutional) neural networks. However, it remains an open question as to how best to evaluate salience map…
Give Me a Choice: The Consequences of Restricting Choices Through AI-Support for Perceived Autonomy, Motivational Variables, and Decision Performance
Cedric Faas, Richard Bergs, Sarah Sterz +2
Design optimizations in human-AI collaboration often focus on cognitive aspects like attention and task load. Drawing on work design literature, we propose that effective human-AI…