activity
20102021
most citedThe elephant in the room: The problem of quantifying productivity in evaluative scientometrics

25 citations · 65 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.DL2021

The three-step workflow: a pragmatic approach to allocating academic hospitals' affiliations for bibliometric purposes

Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Clara Calero-Medina, Martijn S. Visser

This paper presents a method for classifying the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking. A key question…

cs.DL2020★ 22 cited

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

Martijn Visser, Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman

We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. The comparison consi…

cs.DL2016★ 25 cited

The elephant in the room: The problem of quantifying productivity in evaluative scientometrics

Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Martijn Visser +1

In a critical and provocative paper, Abramo and D'Angelo claim that commonly used scientometric indicators such as the mean normalized citation score (MNCS) are completely inapprop…

cs.DL2012★ 3 cited

Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator

Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Thed N. van Leeuwen +1

The SNIP (source normalized impact per paper) indicator is an indicator of the citation impact of scientific journals. The indicator, introduced by Henk Moed in 2010, is included i…

cs.DL2012★ 5 cited

The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

Ludo Waltman, Clara Calero-Medina, Joost Kosten +7

The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 is a ranking of universities based on bibliometric indicators of publication output, citation impact, and scientific collaboration. The ranking include…

cs.DL2011★ 3 cited

On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff

Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Thed N. van Leeuwen +2

Opthof and Leydesdorff [arXiv:1102.2569] reanalyze data reported by Van Raan [arXiv:physics/0511206] and conclude that there is no significant correlation between on the one hand a…