activity
20112021
most citedAcquiring Correct Knowledge for Natural Language Generation

83 citations · 100 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2021

Generation Challenges: Results of the Accuracy Evaluation Shared Task

Craig Thomson, Ehud Reiter

The Shared Task on Evaluating Accuracy focused on techniques (both manual and automatic) for evaluating the factual accuracy of texts produced by neural NLG systems, in a sports-re…

cs.CL20216 cited

Towards objectively evaluating the quality of generated medical summaries

Francesco Moramarco, Damir Juric, Aleksandar Savkov +1

We propose a method for evaluating the quality of generated text by asking evaluators to count facts, and computing precision, recall, f-score, and accuracy from the raw counts. We…

cs.CL20219 cited

A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Aleksandar Savkov +1

Automatic summarisation has the potential to aid physicians in streamlining clerical tasks such as note taking. But it is notoriously difficult to evaluate these systems and demons…

cs.CL20192 cited

Natural Language Generation Challenges for Explainable AI

Ehud Reiter

Good quality explanations of artificial intelligence (XAI) reasoning must be written (and evaluated) for an explanatory purpose, targeted towards their readers, have a good narrati…

cs.CL201183 cited

Acquiring Correct Knowledge for Natural Language Generation

E. Reiter, R. Robertson, S. G. Sripada

Natural language generation (NLG) systems are computer software systems that produce texts in English and other human languages, often from non-linguistic input data. NLG systems,…