226 citations · 1.2k across the 39 of their papers we have counts for
9 papers · 1 filter
Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000 post-publication open peer review publishing model
Mike Thelwall, Verena Weigert, Liz Allen +2
This study examines whether there is any evidence of bias in two areas of common critique of open, non-anonymous peer review - and used in the post-publication, peer review system…
Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields
Mike Thelwall, Nabeil Maflahi
Research collaboration is promoted by governments and research funders but if the relative prevalence and merits of collaboration vary internationally different national and discip…
Mendeley Reader Counts for US Computer Science Conference Papers and Journal articles
Mike Thelwall
Although bibliometrics are normally applied to journal articles when used to support research evaluations, conference papers are at least as important in fast-moving computing-rela…
Large publishing consortia produce higher citation impact research but co-author contributions are hard to evaluate
Mike Thelwall
This paper introduces a simple agglomerative clustering method to identify large publishing consortia with at least 20 authors and 80% shared authorship between articles. Based on…
Female citation impact superiority 1996-2018 in six out of seven English-speaking nations
Mike Thelwall
Efforts to combat continuing gender inequalities in academia need to be informed by evidence about where differences occur. Citations are relevant as potential evidence in appointm…
Should Citations be Counted Separately from Each Originating Section
Mike Thelwall
Articles are cited for different purposes and differentiating between reasons when counting citations may therefore give finer-grained citation count information. Although identify…