most citedAdditive MIL: Intrinsically Interpretable Multiple Instance Learning for Pathology

37 citations · 49 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CV2023★ 6 cited

Improved statistical benchmarking of digital pathology models using pairwise frames evaluation

Ylaine Gerardin, John Shamshoian, Judy Shen +18

Nested pairwise frames is a method for relative benchmarking of cell or tissue digital pathology models against manual pathologist annotations on a set of sampled patches. At a hig…

eess.IV2023★ 1 cited

ContriMix: Scalable stain color augmentation for domain generalization without domain labels in digital pathology

Tan H. Nguyen, Dinkar Juyal, Jin Li +10

Differences in staining and imaging procedures can cause significant color variations in histopathology images, leading to poor generalization when deploying deep-learning models t…

cs.CV2023★ 5 cited

Synthetic DOmain-Targeted Augmentation (S-DOTA) Improves Model Generalization in Digital Pathology

Sai Chowdary Gullapally, Yibo Zhang, Nitin Kumar Mittal +20

Machine learning algorithms have the potential to improve patient outcomes in digital pathology. However, generalization of these tools is currently limited by sensitivity to varia…

cs.CV2023

SC-MIL: Supervised Contrastive Multiple Instance Learning for Imbalanced Classification in Pathology

Dinkar Juyal, Siddhant Shingi, Syed Ashar Javed +6

Multiple Instance learning (MIL) models have been extensively used in pathology to predict biomarkers and risk-stratify patients from gigapixel-sized images. Machine learning probl…

cs.CV2022★ 37 cited

Additive MIL: Intrinsically Interpretable Multiple Instance Learning for Pathology

Syed Ashar Javed, Dinkar Juyal, Harshith Padigela +3

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has been widely applied in pathology towards solving critical problems such as automating cancer diagnosis and grading, predicting patient prognosi…