24 citations · 48 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
A Critical, But Hopefully Cordial, QBist Reply to Ballentine
Blake C. Stacey
L. E. Ballentine's remarks in Physics Today about the QBist interpretation of quantum mechanics are generally wide of the mark.
Whose Probabilities? About What? A Reply to Khrennikov
Blake C. Stacey
In a recent article, Khrennikov claims that a particular theorem about agreement between quantum measurement results poses a problem for the interpretation of quantum mechanics kno…
Is Relational Quantum Mechanics about Facts? If So, Whose? A Reply to Di Biagio and Rovelli's Comment on Brukner and Pienaar
Blake C. Stacey
Brukner and Pienaar have critiqued the Relational Quantum Mechanics of Rovelli, and together with Di Biagio, the latter has replied. I point out a few places where, in my view, tha…
Geometric and Information-Theoretic Properties of the Hoggar Lines
Blake C. Stacey
We take a tour of a set of equiangular lines in eight-dimensional Hilbert space. This structure defines an informationally complete measurement, that is, a way to represent all qua…
My Struggles with the Block Universe
Christopher A. Fuchs, Maximilian Schlosshauer, Blake C. Stacey
This document is the second installment of three in the Cerro Grande Fire Series. Like its predecessor arXiv:quant-ph/0105039, "Notes on a Paulian Idea," it is a collection of lett…