most citedA Meta Survey of Quality Evaluation Criteria in Explanation Methods

23 citations · 50 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Approximating Score-based Explanation Techniques Using Conformal Regression

Amr Alkhatib, Henrik Boström, Sofiane Ennadir +1

Score-based explainable machine-learning techniques are often used to understand the logic behind black-box models. However, such explanation techniques are often computationally e…

cs.LG2023★ 7 cited

Calibrated Explanations for Regression

Tuwe Löfström, Helena Löfström, Ulf Johansson +2

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is often an integral part of modern decision support systems. The best-performing predictive models used in AI-based decision support systems lack tran…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Well-Calibrated Probabilistic Predictive Maintenance using Venn-Abers

Ulf Johansson, Tuwe Löfström, Cecilia Sönströd

When using machine learning for fault detection, a common problem is the fact that most data sets are very unbalanced, with the minority class (a fault) being the interesting one.…

cs.AI2023★ 18 cited

Calibrated Explanations: with Uncertainty Information and Counterfactuals

Helena Lofstrom, Tuwe Lofstrom, Ulf Johansson +1

While local explanations for AI models can offer insights into individual predictions, such as feature importance, they are plagued by issues like instability. The unreliability of…

cs.AI2022★ 23 cited

A Meta Survey of Quality Evaluation Criteria in Explanation Methods

Helena Löfström, Karl Hammar, Ulf Johansson

Explanation methods and their evaluation have become a significant issue in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) due to the recent surge of opaque AI models in decision suppor…