activity
20172024
most citedLarge-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

22 citations · 47 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.DL2024★ 4 cited

Coverage and metadata completeness and accuracy of African research publications in OpenAlex: A comparative analysis

Patricia Alonso-Alvarez, Nees Jan van Eck

Unlike traditional proprietary data sources such as Scopus and the Web of Science (WoS), OpenAlex emphasizes its comprehensiveness. This study analyzes OpenAlex coverage and metada…

cs.DL2022★ 2 cited

Academic information retrieval using citation clusters: In-depth evaluation based on systematic reviews

Juan Pablo Bascur, Suzan Verberne, Nees Jan van Eck +1

The field of scientometrics has shown the power of citation-based clusters for literature analysis, yet this technique has barely been used for information retrieval tasks. This wo…

cs.DL2020★ 22 cited

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

Martijn Visser, Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman

We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. The comparison consi…

cs.DL2018★ 13 cited

Intermediacy of publications

Lovro Šubelj, Ludo Waltman, Vincent Traag +1

Citation networks of scientific publications offer fundamental insights into the structure and development of scientific knowledge. We propose a new measure, called intermediacy, f…

cs.DL2017★ 6 cited

Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer

Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman

Clustering scientific publications in an important problem in bibliometric research. We demonstrate how two software tools, CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer, can be used to cluster pub…