most citedTowards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis

5 citations · 8 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.DL20105 cited

Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis

Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Thed N. van Leeuwen +2

We present an empirical comparison between two normalization mechanisms for citation-based indicators of research performance. These mechanisms aim to normalize citation counts for…

cs.DL20101 cited

A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS

Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Rommert Dekker +1

VOS is a new mapping technique that can serve as an alternative to the well-known technique of multidimensional scaling. We present an extensive comparison between the use of multi…

cs.DL2010

The relation between Eigenfactor, audience factor, and influence weight

Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck

We present a theoretical and empirical analysis of a number of bibliometric indicators of journal performance. We focus on three indicators in particular, namely the Eigenfactor in…

cs.DL20101 cited

Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff

Anthony F. J. van Raan, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Martijn S. Visser +2

We reply to the criticism of Opthof and Leydesdorff [arXiv:1002.2769] on the way in which our institute applies journal and field normalizations to citation counts. We point out wh…

cs.DL20101 cited

Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations

Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Thed N. van Leeuwen +2

The crown indicator is a well-known bibliometric indicator of research performance developed by our institute. The indicator aims to normalize citation counts for differences among…