most citedOn the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigation

53 citations · 156 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2023★ 11 cited

GPT-4 Doesn't Know It's Wrong: An Analysis of Iterative Prompting for Reasoning Problems

Kaya Stechly, Matthew Marquez, Subbarao Kambhampati

There has been considerable divergence of opinion on the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). While the initial optimism that reasoning might emerge automatically w…

cs.AI2023★ 10 cited

Can Large Language Models Really Improve by Self-critiquing Their Own Plans?

Karthik Valmeekam, Matthew Marquez, Subbarao Kambhampati

There have been widespread claims about Large Language Models (LLMs) being able to successfully verify or self-critique their candidate solutions in reasoning problems in an iterat…

cs.AI2023★ 53 cited

On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigation

Karthik Valmeekam, Matthew Marquez, Sarath Sreedharan +1

Intrigued by the claims of emergent reasoning capabilities in LLMs trained on general web corpora, in this paper, we set out to investigate their planning capabilities. We aim to e…

cs.AI2023★ 32 cited

On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)

Karthik Valmeekam, Sarath Sreedharan, Matthew Marquez +2

Intrigued by the claims of emergent reasoning capabilities in LLMs trained on general web corpora, in this paper, we set out to investigate their planning capabilities. We aim to e…

cs.AI2022

Towards customizable reinforcement learning agents: Enabling preference specification through online vocabulary expansion

Utkarsh Soni, Nupur Thakur, Sarath Sreedharan +4

There is a growing interest in developing automated agents that can work alongside humans. In addition to completing the assigned task, such an agent will undoubtedly be expected t…