activity
20202024
most citedResearch Topic Flows in Co-Authorship Networks

20 citations · 66 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

The Geometric Structure of Topic Models

Johannes Hirth, Tom Hanika

Topic models are a popular tool for clustering and analyzing textual data. They allow texts to be classified on the basis of their affiliation to the previously calculated topics.…

cs.AI2023★ 1 cited

Automatic Textual Explanations of Concept Lattices

Johannes Hirth, Viktoria Horn, Gerd Stumme +1

Lattices and their order diagrams are an essential tool for communicating knowledge and insights about data. This is in particular true when applying Formal Concept Analysis. Such…

cs.AI2023★ 3 cited

Ordinal Motifs in Lattices

Johannes Hirth, Viktoria Horn, Gerd Stumme +1

Lattices are a commonly used structure for the representation and analysis of relational and ontological knowledge. In particular, the analysis of these requires a decomposition of…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Scaling Dimension

Bernhard Ganter, Tom Hanika, Johannes Hirth

Conceptual Scaling is a useful standard tool in Formal Concept Analysis and beyond. Its mathematical theory, as elaborated in the last chapter of the FCA monograph, still has room…

cs.LG2023★ 11 cited

Conceptual Views on Tree Ensemble Classifiers

Tom Hanika, Johannes Hirth

Random Forests and related tree-based methods are popular for supervised learning from table based data. Apart from their ease of parallelization, their classification performance…

cs.LG2022

Conceptual Views of Neural Networks: A Framework for Neuro-Symbolic Analysis

Johannes Hirth, Tom Hanika

We introduce \emph{conceptual views} as a formal framework grounded in Formal Concept Analysis for globally explaining neural networks. Experiments on twenty-four ImageNet models a…

cs.SI2022★ 20 cited

Research Topic Flows in Co-Authorship Networks

Bastian Schäfermeier, Johannes Hirth, Tom Hanika

In scientometrics, scientific collaboration is often analyzed by means of co-authorships. An aspect which is often overlooked and more difficult to quantify is the flow of expertis…

cs.LG2021★ 4 cited

Quantifying the Conceptual Error in Dimensionality Reduction

Tom Hanika, Johannes Hirth

Dimension reduction of data sets is a standard problem in the realm of machine learning and knowledge reasoning. They affect patterns in and dependencies on data dimensions and ult…

cs.AI2021★ 3 cited

Exploring Scale-Measures of Data Sets

Tom Hanika, Johannes Hirth

Measurement is a fundamental building block of numerous scientific models and their creation. This is in particular true for data driven science. Due to the high complexity and siz…

cs.AI2020★ 12 cited

On the Lattice of Conceptual Measurements

Tom Hanika, Johannes Hirth

We present a novel approach for data set scaling based on scale-measures from formal concept analysis, i.e., continuous maps between closure systems, and derive a canonical represe…

cs.AI2020★ 9 cited

Knowledge Cores in Large Formal Contexts

Tom Hanika, Johannes Hirth

Knowledge computation tasks are often infeasible for large data sets. This is in particular true when deriving knowledge bases in formal concept analysis (FCA). Hence, it is essent…