activity
20242026
most citedWhen Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency inMulti-Step Agentic AI Tasks

1 citations · 1 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2025

CORGI: Efficient Pattern Matching With Quadratic Guarantees

Daniel Weitekamp

Rule-based systems must solve complex matching problems within tight time constraints to be effective in real-time applications, such as planning and reactive control for AI agents…

cs.LG2025

Decomposed Inductive Procedure Learning: Learning Academic Tasks with Human-Like Data Efficiency

Daniel Weitekamp, Christopher MacLellan, Erik Harpstead +1

Human learning relies on specialization -- distinct cognitive mechanisms working together to enable rapid learning. In contrast, most modern neural networks rely on a single mechan…

cs.AI2025

TutorGym: A Testbed for Evaluating AI Agents as Tutors and Students

Daniel Weitekamp, Momin N. Siddiqui, Christopher J. MacLellan

Recent improvements in large language model (LLM) performance on academic benchmarks, such as MATH and GSM8K, have emboldened their use as standalone tutors and as simulations of h…

cs.HC2025

Beyond Final Answers: Evaluating Large Language Models for Math Tutoring

Adit Gupta, Jennifer Reddig, Tommaso Calo +2

Researchers have made notable progress in applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve math problems, as demonstrated through efforts like GSM8k, ProofNet, AlphaGeometry, and Mat…

cs.LG2025

Data Augmentation for Sparse Multidimensional Learning Performance Data Using Generative AI

Liang Zhang, Jionghao Lin, John Sabatini +6

Learning performance data describe correct and incorrect answers or problem-solving attempts in adaptive learning, such as in intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs). Learning performa…