activity
20032005
collaborators

6 papers

math.RA2005

Two statements about infinite products that are not quite true

George M. Bergman

Hard to summarize concisely; here are the high points. The first two statements below are ring-theoretic; in these R is a nontrivial ring, R^ω, and \bigoplus_ωR are the direct prod…

math.MG2004

On lattices of convex sets in R^n

George M. Bergman

Properties of several sorts of lattices of convex subsets of R^n are examined. The lattice of convex sets containing the origin turns out, for n>1, to satisfy a set of identities s…

math.GR2004

Closed subgroups of the infinite symmetric group

George M. Bergman, Saharon Shelah

Let S=Sym(Ω) be the group of all permutations of a countably infinite set Ω, and for subgroups G_1, G_2\leq S let us write G_1\approx G_2 if there exists a finite set U\subseteq S…

math.GR2004

Generating infinite symmetric groups

George M. Bergman

Let S=Sym(Ω) be the group of all permutations of an infinite set Ω. Extending an argument of Macpherson and Neumann, it is shown that if U is a generating set for S as a group, res…

math.CT2003

Direct limits and fixed point sets

George M. Bergman

For which groups G is it true that whenever we form a direct limit of G-sets, dirlim_{i\in I} X_i, the set of its fixed points, (dirlim_I X_i)^G, can be obtained as the direct limi…

math.AC2003

Can one factor the classical adjoint of a generic matrix?

George M. Bergman

Let k be a field, n a positive integer, X a generic nxn matrix over k (i.e., a matrix (x_{ij}) of n^2 independent indeterminates over the polynomial ring k[x_{ij}]), and adj(X) its…