most citedA neutral comparison of statistical methods for time-to-event analyses under non-proportional hazards

2 citations · 3 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing stat.MEShow all

2 papers · 1 filter

stat.ME2023★ 2 cited

A neutral comparison of statistical methods for time-to-event analyses under non-proportional hazards

Florian Klinglmüller, Tobias Fellinger, Franz König +10

While well-established methods for time-to-event data are available when the proportional hazards assumption holds, there is no consensus on the best inferential approach under non…

stat.ME2023

Methods for non-proportional hazards in clinical trials: A systematic review

Maximilian Bardo, Cynthia Huber, Norbert Benda +13

For the analysis of time-to-event data, frequently used methods such as the log-rank test or the Cox proportional hazards model are based on the proportional hazards assumption, wh…