activity
20142024
most citedInterpretable Sensitivity Analysis for Balancing Weights

20 citations · 32 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

stat.ME2024

MultiObjMatch: Matching with Optimal Tradeoffs between Multiple Objectives in R

Shichao Han, Samuel D. Pimentel

In an observational study, matching aims to create many small sets of similar treated and control units from initial samples that may differ substantially in order to permit more c…

stat.ME2024

Re-evaluating the impact of hormone replacement therapy on heart disease using match-adaptive randomization inference

Samuel D. Pimentel, Ruoqi Yu

Matching is an appealing way to design observational studies because it mimics the data structure produced by stratified randomized trials, pairing treated individuals with similar…

stat.ME2023★ 3 cited

Design Sensitivity and Its Implications for Weighted Observational Studies

Melody Huang, Dan Soriano, Samuel D. Pimentel

Sensitivity to unmeasured confounding is not typically a primary consideration in designing treated-control comparisons in observational studies. We introduce a framework allowing…

stat.ME2023

JOINTVIP: Prioritizing variables in observational study design with joint variable importance plot in R

Lauren D. Liao, Samuel D. Pimentel

Credible causal effect estimation requires treated subjects and controls to be otherwise similar. In observational settings, such as analysis of electronic health records, this is…

stat.ME2023★ 4 cited

Prioritizing Variables for Observational Study Design using the Joint Variable Importance Plot

Lauren D. Liao, Yeyi Zhu, Amanda L. Ngo +2

Observational studies of treatment effects require adjustment for confounding variables. However, causal inference methods typically cannot deliver perfect adjustment on all measur…

stat.ME2022★ 4 cited

Variance-based sensitivity analysis for weighting estimators result in more informative bounds

Melody Huang, Samuel D. Pimentel

Weighting methods are popular tools for estimating causal effects; assessing their robustness under unobserved confounding is important in practice. In the following paper, we intr…

stat.ME2022★ 1 cited

Covariate-adaptive randomization inference in matched designs

Samuel D. Pimentel, Yaxuan Huang

It is common to conduct causal inference in matched observational studies by proceeding as though treatment assignments within matched sets are assigned uniformly at random and usi…

stat.ME2022

Robust inference for matching under rolling enrollment

Amanda K. Glazer, Samuel D. Pimentel

Matching in observational studies faces complications when units enroll in treatment on a rolling basis. While each treated unit has a specific time of entry into the study, contro…

stat.ME2021★ 20 cited

Interpretable Sensitivity Analysis for Balancing Weights

Dan Soriano, Eli Ben-Michael, Peter J. Bickel +2

Assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding is an important step in observational studies, which typically estimate effects under the assumption that all confounders are measur…

stat.ME2019

The uniform general signed rank test and its design sensitivity

Steven R. Howard, Samuel D. Pimentel

A sensitivity analysis in an observational study tests whether the qualitative conclusions of an analysis would change if we were to allow for the possibility of limited bias due t…

stat.ME2014

Variable-Ratio Matching with Fine Balance in a Study of Peer Health Exchange

Luke Keele, Sam Pimentel, Frank Yoon

In observational studies of treatment effects, matched samples are created so treated and control groups are similar in terms of observable covariates. Traditionally such matched s…