most citedGenerative Judge for Evaluating Alignment

5 citations · 7 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

6 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarization

Shichao Sun, Ruifeng Yuan, Ziqiang Cao +2

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the capacity to improve summary quality by mirroring a human-like iterative process of critique and refinement starting from the init…

cs.CL2024

Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences

Junlong Li, Fan Zhou, Shichao Sun +3

As a relative quality comparison of model responses, human and Large Language Model (LLM) preferences serve as common alignment goals in model fine-tuning and criteria in evaluatio…

cs.CL2024

Reformatted Alignment

Run-Ze Fan, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou +5

The quality of finetuning data is crucial for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values. Current methods to improve data quality are either labor-intensive or prone t…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Extending LLMs' Context Window with 100 Samples

Yikai Zhang, Junlong Li, Pengfei Liu

Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to have limited extrapolation ability beyond their pre-trained context window, constraining their application in downstream tasks with length…

cs.CL2024

The Critique of Critique

Shichao Sun, Junlong Li, Weizhe Yuan +3

Critique, as a natural language description for assessing the quality of model-generated content, has played a vital role in the training, evaluation, and refinement of LLMs. Howev…

cs.CL2023★ 5 cited

Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment

Junlong Li, Shichao Sun, Weizhe Yuan +3

The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has substantially expanded the range of tasks they can address. In the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), researchers…