activity
20222026
most citedMonotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes

1 citations · 1 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

stat.ML2026

Why Heavy-Tailed Weight Spectra Predict Model Quality

Joseph Wilson, Chris van der Heide, Liam Hodgkinson +3

A solid understanding of the predictive success of deep neural networks (DNNs) remains elusive. For example, while many data-dependent metrics exist that seek to predict model qual…

stat.ML2026

Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?

Joseph Wilson, Chris van der Heide, Liam Hodgkinson +1

Epistemic uncertainty quantification (UQ) for deep neural networks (DNNs) is a requirement for safe adoption of AI in mission-critical settings. Several leading methods for UQ line…

stat.ML2024

Gradient-enhanced deep Gaussian processes for multifidelity modelling

Viv Bone, Chris van der Heide, Kieran Mackle +3

Multifidelity models integrate data from multiple sources to produce a single approximator for the underlying process. Dense low-fidelity samples are used to reduce interpolation e…

stat.ML2023

A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion

Liam Hodgkinson, Chris van der Heide, Robert Salomone +2

Deep learning is renowned for its theory-practice gap, whereby principled theory typically fails to provide much beneficial guidance for implementation in practice. This has been h…

stat.ML2022★ 1 cited

Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes

Liam Hodgkinson, Chris van der Heide, Fred Roosta +1

Despite their importance for assessing reliability of predictions, uncertainty quantification (UQ) measures for machine learning models have only recently begun to be rigorously ch…