20 citations · 23 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
3 papers
cs.CL2026
Inverse Turing Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Judges of Human vs. AI Dialogue
William Hager, Ishika Rathi, Masum Hasan +1
As AI systems integrate into online spaces, differentiating them from humans in conversations is increasingly important. We present Inverse Turing Bench, a benchmark that evaluates…
cs.HC2024★ 3 cited
GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests
Ishika Rathi, Sydney Taylor, Benjamin K. Bergen +1
Everyday AI detection requires differentiating between people and AI in informal, online conversations. In many cases, people will not interact directly with AI systems but instead…
cs.HC2024★ 20 cited
People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing test
Cameron R. Jones, Benjamin K. Bergen
We evaluated 3 systems (ELIZA, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) in a randomized, controlled, and preregistered Turing test. Human participants had a 5 minute conversation with either a human or…