4 papers
Comparing Developer and LLM Biases in Code Evaluation
Aditya Mittal, Ryan Shar, Zichu Wu +6
As LLMs are increasingly used as judges in code applications, they should be evaluated in realistic interactive settings that capture partial context and ambiguous intent. We prese…
EDIT-Bench: Evaluating LLM Abilities to Perform Real-World Instructed Code Edits
Wayne Chi, Valerie Chen, Ryan Shar +8
Instructed code editing, where LLMs directly modify a developer's existing code based on a user instruction, is becoming a widely used interaction mode in AI coding assistants. How…
CodeAlignBench: Assessing Code Generation Models on Developer-Preferred Code Adjustments
Forough Mehralian, Ryan Shar, James R. Rae +1
As large language models become increasingly capable of generating code, evaluating their performance remains a complex and evolving challenge. Existing benchmarks primarily focus…
When Benchmarks Talk: Re-Evaluating Code LLMs with Interactive Feedback
Jane Pan, Ryan Shar, Jacob Pfau +3
Programming is a fundamentally interactive process, yet coding assistants are often evaluated using static benchmarks that fail to measure how well models collaborate with users. W…