4 papers
On Strong Equivalence Notions in Logic Programming and Abstract Argumentation
Giovanni Buraglio, Wolfgang Dvorak, Stefan Woltran
Strong equivalence between knowledge bases ensures the possibility of replacing one with the other without affecting reasoning outcomes, in any given context. This makes it a cruci…
Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks and Supports
Matti Berthold, Lydia Blümel, Giovanni Buraglio +1
This work proposes novel splitting techniques for argumentation formalisms that incorporate supports between defeasible elements. We base our studies on bipolar set-based argumenta…
Splitting Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Giovanni Buraglio, Wolfgang Dvorak, Stefan Woltran
Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-established formalism for modelling and reasoning over debates, with a wide range of applications. However, the high computational co…
An Extension-Based Argument-Ranking Semantics: Social Rankings in Abstract Argumentation Long Version
Lars Bengel, Giovanni Buraglio, Jan Maly +1
In this paper, we introduce a new family of argument-ranking semantics which can be seen as a refinement of the classification of arguments into skeptically accepted, credulously a…