30 citations · 30 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Mass Determination in Cascade Decays Using Shape Formulas
B. K. Gjelsten, D. J. Miller, P. Osland +1
In SUSY scenarios with invisible LSP, sparticle masses can be determined from fits to the endpoints of invariant mass distributions. Here we discuss possible improvements by using…
Mass ambiguities in cascade decays
B. K. Gjelsten, D. J. Miller, P. Osland +1
We review the use of invariant mass distributions in cascade decays to measure the masses of New Physics (NP) particles in scenarios where the final NP cascade particle is invisibl…
Determining masses of supersymmetric particles
B. K. Gjelsten, D. J. Miller, P. Osland
If supersymmetric particles are produced at the Large Hadron Collider it becomes very important not only to identify them, but also to determine their masses with the highest possi…
Resolving ambiguities in mass determinations at future colliders
B. K. Gjelsten, D. J. Miller, P. Osland
The measurements of kinematical endpoints, in cascade decays of supersymmetric particles, in principle allow for a determination of the masses of the unstable particles. However, i…
Measurement of the Gluino Mass via Cascade Decays for SPS 1a
B. K. Gjelsten, D. J. Miller, P. Osland
If R-parity conserving supersymmetry is realised with masses below the TeV scale, sparticles will be produced and decay in cascades at the LHC. In the case of a neutral LSP, which…
Measurement of SUSY masses via cascade decays for SPS 1a
B. K. Gjelsten, D. J. Miller, P. Osland
If R-parity conserving supersymmetry exists below the TeV-scale, new particles will be produced and decay in cascades at the LHC. The lightest supersymmetric particle will escape t…