activity
20242026
most citedAutoSOUP: Safety-Oriented Unit Proof Generation for Component-level Memory-Safety Verification

1 citations · 1 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CR2025

Reactive Bottom-Up Testing

Siddharth Muralee, Sourag Cherupattamoolayil, James C. Davis +2

Modern computing systems remain rife with software vulnerabilities. Engineers apply many means to detect them, of which dynamic testing is one of the most common and effective. How…

cs.CR2025

LEMIX: Enabling Testing of Embedded Applications as Linux Applications (Extended Report)

Sai Ritvik Tanksalkar, Siddharth Muralee, Srihari Danduri +4

Dynamic analysis, through rehosting, is an important capability for security assessment in embedded systems software. Existing rehosting techniques aim to provide high-fidelity exe…

cs.CR2025

LM-Scout: Analyzing the Security of Language Model Integration in Android Apps

Muhammad Ibrahim, Gűliz Seray Tuncay, Z. Berkay Celik +2

Developers are increasingly integrating Language Models (LMs) into their mobile apps to provide features such as chat-based assistants. To prevent LM misuse, they impose various re…

cs.SE2025

Finding 709 Defects in 258 Projects: An Experience Report on Applying CodeQL to Open-Source Embedded Software (Experience Paper) -- Extended Report

Mingjie Shen, Akul Abhilash Pillai, Brian A. Yuan +2

In this experience paper, we report on a large-scale empirical study of Static Application Security Testing (SAST) in Open-Source Embedded Software (EMBOSS) repositories. We collec…

cs.SE2025

Do Unit Proofs Work? An Empirical Study of Compositional Bounded Model Checking for Memory Safety Verification

Paschal C. Amusuo, Owen Cochell, Taylor Le Lievre +3

Memory safety defects pose a major threat to software reliability, enabling cyberattacks, outages, and crashes. To mitigate these risks, organizations adopt Compositional Bounded M…