collaborators

19 papers

cs.CL2026

DelusionEval: Measuring Delusion-Linked Behaviors in AI Chatbots

Jared Moore, Andrea Mock, Yifan Mai +9

Mental health professionals have raised concerns about risks of psychological harm from interaction with large language models (LLMs), including "delusional spirals" in which conce…

cs.AI2026

Expert Evaluation of Clinical AI Tools on Real Point-of-Care Clinical Queries

Jean Feng, Vishal Patel, Patrick Heagerty +5

Physicians now pose millions of clinical questions to AI tools each week, yet these tools are evaluated largely on hypothetical or exam-style questions, not those actually asked in…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.AI2026

Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees

Siyu Zhou, Patrick Vossler, Venkatesh Sivaraman +2

A major bottleneck in characterizing the failure modes of generative AI systems is the cost and time of annotation and evaluation. Consequently, adaptive testing paradigms have gai…

cs.AI2026

Optimization before Evaluation: Evaluation with Unoptimised Prompts Can be Misleading

Nicholas Sadjoli, Tim Siefken, Atin Ghosh +2

Current Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation frameworks utilize the same static prompt template across all models under evaluation. This differs from the common industry practice…

cs.LG2026

LLMs Judging LLMs: A Simplex Perspective

Patrick Vossler, Fan Xia, Yifan Mai +2

Given the challenge of automatically evaluating free-form outputs from large language models (LLMs), an increasingly common solution is to use LLMs themselves as the judging mechan…