collaborators

13 papers

cs.CR2026

CreepScope: Measuring Post-Use Authorization Exposure in Tool-Using Agents

Haoran Yu, Lifei Liu, Danping Zhang +4

Authorization checks at individual tool calls do not reveal how long earlier authority remains usable. We study this lifecycle failure as privilege creep: a capability stays reacha…

cs.CL2026

Noise Floor Audit for Agent Benchmarks

Yihang Chen, Pin Qian, Su Wang +4

We audit measurement variability for 3 native tool-calling endpoints across 2 providers on the official BFCL multiple and parallel categories, using matched AST grading. At tempera…

cs.AI2026

Explicit State Elicitation Is Not Enough: A Controlled Audit of Memory-Policy Classification

Yihang Chen, Pin Qian, Su Wang +4

Personalized agents must decide whether retrieved user memory should be used, ignored, updated, or queried before it affects a current task. We use this setting to develop an empir…

cs.AI2026

BAP-SQL: Budget-Aware Observation Planning for Agentic Text-to-SQL

Chong Peng, Pin Qian, Su Wang +2

Tool-using agents do not merely consume observations: their actions determine what arrives next. In agentic text-to-SQL, a broad query can spend context and database work before us…

cs.LG2026

When Should Active RAG Retrieve? A Budget-Aware Evaluation of Utility, Calibration, and Cost

Pin Qian, Su Wang, Chong Peng +5

Active RAG systems decide when to retrieve external knowledge during generation, making them a budget-sensitive case of agentic RAG and self-adaptive retrieval. Yet evaluations oft…

cs.LG2026

Toward User-Conditioned Evaluation of Personal LLM Agents under Temporal Interventions

Pin Qian, Su Wang, Yihang Chen +5

Personal agents maintain memories, learned skills, tool configurations, and policy state that evolve with each user. Existing agent benchmarks often evaluate these capabilities in…

cs.CR2026

Phantom Guardrails: When Self-Improving Agent Harnesses Fix Failures That Never Happened

Su Wang, Pin Qian, Yifan Lin +5

Self-improving AI agents are designed to learn from their mistakes. We show they can also hallucinate mistakes that never happened. We study this failure mode in automated harness…

cs.AI2026

Operational Reframing and Approval-Framed Delegation in Multi-Agent LLM Safety

Lifei Liu, Haoran Yu, Xiaochong Jiang +3

Safety evaluations of multi-agent LLM systems often compare a direct prompt with a planner-executor pipeline and report the difference as a single "pipeline effect." We argue that…

cs.SE2026

Habituation at the Gate: Rising Approval and Declining Scrutiny in Human Review of AI Agent Code

Haoran Yu, Lifei Liu, Xiaochong Jiang +4

As AI coding agents (e.g., GitHub Copilot, Devin, OpenAI Codex, Cursor) submit pull requests to open-source repositories at scale, a key question arises: do human reviewers gradual…

cs.SE2026

Beyond Simpson's Paradox: A Cascade of Confounders in AI Agent Pull-Request Co-Authorship

Haoran Yu, Xiaochong Jiang, Lifei Liu +3

Pooled across five AI coding agents, pull requests (PRs) with a human Co-Authored-By trailer merge less often than purely-autonomous ones (53.8% vs. 79.8%) -- yet this aggregate fi…

cs.SE2026

When Safe Skills Collide: Measuring Compositional Risk in Agent Skill Ecosystems

Su Wang, Pin Qian, Yihang Chen +6

LLM agents increasingly rely on community-contributed skills that expand an agent's operational capability set. We study a core safety problem in agentic AI systems: whether indivi…

cs.AI2026

Relevant Is Not Warranted: Evidence-Force Calibration for Cited RAG

Pin Qian, Su Wang, Xiaoyuan Wang +7

Cited RAG evaluation often treats visible sources as a grounding signal, but a real, topically relevant citation can still under-warrant the attached wording. We study this diagnos…

cs.CL2026

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict

Yihang Chen, Pin Qian, Su Wang +4

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is usually evaluated by whether the final answer is correct. Under knowledge conflict, this hides a key question: did the model follow retrieve…