activity
20062015
most citedDoes the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?

182 citations · 456 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

7 papers

cs.DL2015★ 8 cited

Cited Half-Life of the Journal Literature

Philip M. Davis, Angela Cochran

Analyzing 13,455 journals listed in the Journal Citation Report (Thomson Reuters) from 1997 through 2013, we report that the mean cited half-life of the scholarly literature is 6.5…

cs.DL2009★ 7 cited

Studies on access: a review

Philip M. Davis

A review of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information. This review focuses on surveys of authors, article download and citation analysis.

cs.DL2008★ 82 cited

Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: a citation analysis

Philip M. Davis

In this article, we analyze the citations to articles published in 11 biological and medical journals from 2003 to 2007 that employ author-choice open access models. Controlling fo…

cs.DL2008★ 105 cited

Eigenfactor : Does the Principle of Repeated Improvement Result in Better Journal Impact Estimates than Raw Citation Counts?

Philip M. Davis

Eigenfactor.org, a journal evaluation tool which uses an iterative algorithm to weight citations (similar to the PageRank algorithm used for Google) has been proposed as a more val…

cs.DL2007

Citation advantage of Open Access articles likely explained by quality differential and media effects

Philip M. Davis

In a study of articles published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Gunther Eysenbach discovered a significant citation advantage for those articles made freel…

cs.DL2006★ 182 cited

Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?

Philip M. Davis, Michael J. Fromerth

An analysis of 2,765 articles published in four math journals from 1997 to 2005 indicate that articles deposited in the arXiv received 35% more citations on average than non-deposi…