activity
20082026
most citedFrom Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities

6.3k citations · 8.6k across the 22 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.DLShow all

6 papers · 1 filter

cs.DL2022★ 18 cited

Causal foundations of bias, disparity and fairness

V. A. Traag, L. Waltman

The study of biases, such as gender or racial biases, is an important topic in the social and behavioural sciences. However, the literature does not always clearly define the conce…

cs.DL2020★ 1 cited

Metrics and peer review agreement at the institutional level

V. A. Traag, M. Malgarini, S. Sarlo

In the past decades, many countries have started to fund academic institutions based on the evaluation of their scientific performance. In this context, post-publication peer revie…

cs.DL2019★ 38 cited

Inferring the causal effect of journals on citations

V. A. Traag

Articles in high-impact journals are, on average, more frequently cited. But are they cited more often because those articles are somehow more "citable"? Or are they cited more oft…

cs.DL2018★ 13 cited

Intermediacy of publications

Lovro Šubelj, Ludo Waltman, Vincent Traag +1

Citation networks of scientific publications offer fundamental insights into the structure and development of scientific knowledge. We propose a new measure, called intermediacy, f…

cs.DL2018★ 64 cited

Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF

Vincent Traag, Ludo Waltman

When performing a national research assessment, some countries rely on citation metrics whereas others, such as the UK, primarily use peer review. In the influential Metric Tide re…

cs.DL2017

Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not?

Ludo Waltman, Vincent A. Traag

Most scientometricians reject the use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles and their authors. The well-known San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessm…