activity
20232026
most citedAutomated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review

230 citations · 231 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI2026

Rethinking Scaffolding in LLM Tutors: The Interactional Mismatch Between Benchmarks and Real-World Deployments

Alexandra Neagu, Jeffrey T. H. Wong, Marcus Messer +2

A central pedagogical value evaluated in AI tutor benchmarks is scaffolding: guiding students through graduated steps toward a solution. Alignment and evaluation methods for embedd…

cs.CY2026

Ed API: Towards a Shared API for Education Microservices

Maximillan Sölch, Alexandra Neagu, Marcus Messer +5

Learning at scale often requires domain-specific automation such as assessment and feedback. An organization locked in to a general learning platform without these specialist autom…

cs.HC2026

"How Do I ...?": Procedural Questions Predominate Student-LLM Chatbot Conversations

Alexandra Neagu, Marcus Messer, Peter Johnson +1

Providing scaffolding through educational chatbots built on Large Language Models (LLM) has potential risks and benefits that remain an open area of research. When students navigat…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

How Consistent Are Humans When Grading Programming Assignments?

Marcus Messer, Neil C. C. Brown, Michael Kölling +1

Providing consistent summative assessment to students is important, as the grades they are awarded affect their progression through university and future career prospects. While sm…

cs.SE2023★ 230 cited

Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review

Marcus Messer, Neil C. C. Brown, Michael Kölling +1

We conducted a systematic literature review on automated grading and feedback tools for programming education. We analysed 121 research papers from 2017 to 2021 inclusive and categ…