activity
20232026
most citedHelping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking

3 citations · 6 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2026

Expected Reward Prediction, with Applications to Model Routing

Kenan Hasanaliyev, Silas Alberti, Jenny Hamer +5

Reward models are a standard tool to score responses from LLMs. Reward models are built to rank responses to a fixed prompt sampled from a single model, for example to choose the b…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Bias in Language Models: Beyond Trick Tests and Toward RUTEd Evaluation

Kristian Lum, Jacy Reese Anthis, Kevin Robinson +2

Standard benchmarks of bias and fairness in large language models (LLMs) measure the association between the user attributes stated or implied by a prompt and the LLM's short text…

cs.CL2024

Transforming and Combining Rewards for Aligning Large Language Models

Zihao Wang, Chirag Nagpal, Jonathan Berant +4

A common approach for aligning language models to human preferences is to first learn a reward model from preference data, and then use this reward model to update the language mod…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policy

Ahmad Beirami, Alekh Agarwal, Jonathan Berant +4

A simple and effective method for the inference-time alignment and scaling test-time compute of generative models is best-of- sampling, where samples are drawn from a refere…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking

Jacob Eisenstein, Chirag Nagpal, Alekh Agarwal +9

Reward models play a key role in aligning language model applications towards human preferences. However, this setup creates an incentive for the language model to exploit errors i…