15 citations · 29 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers · 1 filter
Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: measuring coverage of academic fields
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
The importance of open bibliographic repositories is widely accepted by the scientific community. For evaluation processes, however, there is still some skepticism: even if large r…
Academics evaluating academics: a methodology to inform the review process on top of open citations
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. In this work, we aim at introducing a methodo…
Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
The need for open scientific knowledge graphs is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still few free…
Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. Indeed, the Italian National Scientific Quali…