most citedRebalancing-versus-Rebalancing: Improving the fidelity of Loss-versus-Rebalancing

1 citations · 1 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

q-fin.MF2026

Riemannian Geometry of Optimal Rebalancing in Dynamic Weight Automated Market Makers

Matthew Willetts

We show that when a dynamic-weight AMM rebalances by creating arbitrage opportunities, the per-step log loss is the KL divergence between successive weight vectors. The Fisher-Rao…

q-fin.TR2026

Pools as Portfolios: Observed arbitrage efficiency & LVR analysis of dynamic weight AMMs

Matthew Willetts, Christian Harrington

Dynamic-weight AMMs (aka Temporal Function Market Makers, TFMMs) implement algorithmic asset allocation, analogous to index or smart beta funds, by continuously updating pools' wei…

q-fin.TR2024★ 1 cited

Rebalancing-versus-Rebalancing: Improving the fidelity of Loss-versus-Rebalancing

Matthew Willetts, Christian Harrington

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) hold assets and are constantly being rebalanced by external arbitrageurs to match external market prices. Loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is a pivotal…

q-fin.TR2024

Multiblock MEV opportunities & protections in dynamic AMMs

Matthew Willetts, Christian Harrington

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) in Constant Function Market Making is fairly well understood. Does having dynamic weights, as found in liquidity boostrap pools (LBPs), Temporal-fun…

q-fin.TR2024

Optimal Rebalancing in Dynamic AMMs

Matthew Willetts, Christian Harrington

Dynamic AMM pools, as found in Temporal Function Market Making, rebalance their holdings to a new desired ratio (e.g. moving from being 50-50 between two assets to being 90-10 in f…

q-fin.TR2024

Closed-form solutions for generic N-token AMM arbitrage

Matthew Willetts, Christian Harrington

Convex optimisation has provided a mechanism to determine arbitrage trades on automated market markets (AMMs) since almost their inception. Here we outline generic closed-form solu…