587 citations · 2.1k across the 58 of their papers we have counts for
10 papers · 1 filter
How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?
Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Alina Beygelzimer +7
How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,…
Batching of Tasks by Users of Pseudonymous Forums: Anonymity Compromise and Protection
Alexander Goldberg, Giulia Fanti, Nihar B. Shah
There are a number of forums where people participate under pseudonyms. One example is peer review, where the identity of reviewers for any paper is confidential. When participatin…
Allocation Schemes in Analytic Evaluation: Applicant-Centric Holistic or Attribute-Centric Segmented?
Jingyan Wang, Carmel Baharav, Nihar B. Shah +2
Many applications such as hiring and university admissions involve evaluation and selection of applicants. These tasks are fundamentally difficult, and require combining evidence f…
Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment
Steven Jecmen, Nihar B. Shah, Fei Fang +1
Many conferences rely on paper bidding as a key component of their reviewer assignment procedure. These bids are then taken into account when assigning reviewers to help ensure tha…
A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review
Steven Jecmen, Minji Yoon, Vincent Conitzer +2
In conference peer review, reviewers are often asked to provide "bids" on each submitted paper that express their interest in reviewing that paper. A paper assignment algorithm the…
Integrating Rankings into Quantized Scores in Peer Review
Yusha Liu, Yichong Xu, Nihar B. Shah +1
In peer review, reviewers are usually asked to provide scores for the papers. The scores are then used by Area Chairs or Program Chairs in various ways in the decision-making proce…