collaborators

5 papers

cs.SE2026

Improving LLM-Based Go Code Review through Issue-List Generation and Context Augmentation

Kexin Sun, Yucong Guan, Jiaqi Sun +6

LLMs have shown strong potential for automating code review, yet their practical utility depends heavily on the design of generation and context strategies. In this paper, we inves…

cs.SE2026

Does AI Code Review Lead to Code Changes? A Case Study of GitHub Actions

Kexin Sun, Hongyu Kuang, Sebastian Baltes +6

AI-based code review tools automatically review and comment on pull requests to improve code quality. Despite their growing presence, little is known about their actual impact. We…

cs.SE2026

AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Context

Lei Zhang, Yongda Yu, Minghui Yu +11

High-quality evaluation benchmarks are pivotal for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in Automated Code Review (ACR). However, existing benchmarks suffer from two critical limi…

cs.SE2025

Brevity is the Soul of Wit: Condensing Code Changes to Improve Commit Message Generation

Hongyu Kuang, Ning Zhang, Hui Gao +6

Commit messages are valuable resources for describing why code changes are committed to repositories in version control systems (e.g., Git). They effectively help developers unders…

cs.SE2025

Distilling Desired Comments for Enhanced Code Review with Large Language Models

Yongda Yu, Lei Zhang, Guoping Rong +9

There has been a growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) for code review thanks to their proven proficiency in code comprehension. The primary objective of most revi…