most citedFindings of the IWSLT 2024 Evaluation Campaign

5 citations · 7 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

7 papers

cs.CL2026

Last Translation Benchmark

Vilém Zouhar, Niyati Bafna, Mukund Choudhary +241

For scientific progress, we need benchmarks that test the limits of state-of-the-art models, and evaluation methods that inform us about failure cases. As models get stronger, stan…

cs.CL2026

Dynamically Allocating Evaluation Effort for Model Ranking

Vilém Zouhar, Julia Kreutzer, Alon Lavie +4

While human evaluation is the gold standard in many NLP tasks, it suffers from prohibitive costs and poor scalability. When identifying top-performing models, typical evaluation pr…

cs.CL2026

Instability of LLM Pre-Pretraining: It Doesn't Always Help. An Investigation on Multiple Languages

Sofiia Riazhskykh, Nam Luu, Ondřej Bojar

Pretraining LLMs on artificial languages ("pre-pretraining") is a technique that could reportedly increase token efficiency by 33%, i.e., save up to 33% of training tokens needed t…

cs.CL20245 cited

Findings of the IWSLT 2024 Evaluation Campaign

Ibrahim Said Ahmad, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Ondřej Bojar +42

This paper reports on the shared tasks organized by the 21st IWSLT Conference. The shared tasks address 7 scientific challenges in spoken language translation: simultaneous and off…

cs.LG2024

Adversarial Testing as a Tool for Interpretability: Length-based Overfitting of Elementary Functions in Transformers

Patrik Zavoral, Dušan Variš, Ondřej Bojar

The Transformer model has a tendency to overfit various aspects of the training data, such as the overall sequence length. We study elementary string edit functions using a defined…

cs.CL20242 cited

Preliminary WMT24 Ranking of General MT Systems and LLMs

Tom Kocmi, Eleftherios Avramidis, Rachel Bawden +18

This is the preliminary ranking of WMT24 General MT systems based on automatic metrics. The official ranking will be a human evaluation, which is superior to the automatic ranking…