most citedLatent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs

3 citations · 4 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG2026

Diffuse AI Control on Fuzzy Tasks

Mikhail Terekhov, Caglar Gulcehre, Vivek Hebbar +1

AI models deployed in critical domains, such as AI safety research, may subtly sabotage our efforts due to misalignment. Diffuse AI Control is a subfield of AI safety concerned wit…

cs.LG2026

Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervision

Emil Ryd, Henning Bartsch, Julian Stastny +2

As AI systems begin to automate complex tasks, supervision increasingly relies on weaker models or limited human oversight that cannot fully verify output quality. A model more cap…

cs.AI2026

Auditing Sabotage Bench: A Benchmark for Detecting and Fixing Research Sabotage in ML Codebases

Eric Gan, Aryan Bhatt, Buck Shlegeris +2

As AI systems are increasingly used to conduct research autonomously, misaligned systems could introduce subtle flaws that produce misleading results while evading detection. We in…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Adaptive Deployment of Untrusted LLMs Reduces Distributed Threats

Jiaxin Wen, Vivek Hebbar, Caleb Larson +9

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, it is prudent to assess whether safety measures remain effective even if LLMs intentionally try to bypass them. Previou…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs

Abhay Sheshadri, Aidan Ewart, Phillip Guo +8

Large language models (LLMs) can often be made to behave in undesirable ways that they are explicitly fine-tuned not to. For example, the LLM red-teaming literature has produced a…