activity
20232026
most citedEvaluating the Evaluator: Measuring LLMs' Adherence to Task Evaluation Instructions

13 citations · 18 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

8 papers

cs.AI2026

Referential Uncertainty in Human--AI Collaboration

Christian Poelitz, Finale Doshi-Velez, Siân Lindley

Effective human-AI collaboration requires partners to establish references through interaction, which becomes fragile when descriptions are ambiguous, similar referents compete, or…

cs.HC2026

From Binary Groundedness to Support Relations: Towards a Reader-Centred Taxonomy for Comprehension of AI Output

Advait Sarkar, Christian Poelitz, Viktor Kewenig

Generative AI tools often answer questions using source documents, e.g., through retrieval augmented generation. Current groundedness and hallucination evaluations largely frame th…

cs.HC2026

A Benchmark to Assess Common Ground in Human-AI Collaboration

Christian Poelitz, Finale Doshi-Velez, Siân Lindley

AI is becoming increasingly integrated into everyday life, both in professional work environments and in leisure and entertainment contexts. This integration requires AI to move be…

cs.CL2025

Synthetic Clarification and Correction Dialogues about Data-Centric Tasks -- A Teacher-Student Approach

Christian Poelitz, Nick McKenna

Real dialogues with AI assistants for solving data-centric tasks often follow dynamic, unpredictable paths due to imperfect information provided by the user or in the data, which m…

cs.CL2025

Synthetic Function Demonstrations Improve Generation in Low-Resource Programming Languages

Nick McKenna, Xinnuo Xu, Jack Williams +3

A key consideration when training an LLM is whether the target language is more or less resourced, for example English compared to Welsh, or Python compared to Excel. Typical train…

cs.HC2024★ 5 cited

When Copilot Becomes Autopilot: Generative AI's Critical Risk to Knowledge Work and a Critical Solution

Advait Sarkar, Xiaotong, Xu +3

Generative AI, with its tendency to "hallucinate" incorrect results, may pose a risk to knowledge work by introducing errors. On the other hand, it may also provide unprecedented o…

cs.AI2024★ 13 cited

Evaluating the Evaluator: Measuring LLMs' Adherence to Task Evaluation Instructions

Bhuvanashree Murugadoss, Christian Poelitz, Ian Drosos +5

LLMs-as-a-judge is a recently popularized method which replaces human judgements in task evaluation (Zheng et al. 2024) with automatic evaluation using LLMs. Due to widespread use…

cs.CL2023

InstructExcel: A Benchmark for Natural Language Instruction in Excel

Justin Payan, Swaroop Mishra, Mukul Singh +7

With the evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) we can solve increasingly more complex NLP tasks across various domains, including spreadsheets. This work investigates whether L…