most citedExplaining Human Activity Recognition with SHAP: Validating Insights with Perturbation and Quantitative Measures

27 citations · 37 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.HC2025

Towards Biomarker Discovery for Early Cerebral Palsy Detection: Evaluating Explanations Through Kinematic Perturbations

Kimji N. Pellano, Inga Strümke, Daniel Groos +3

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a prevalent motor disability in children, for which early detection can significantly improve treatment outcomes. While skeleton-based Graph Convolutional Ne…

cs.SE2025

What Does Explainable AI Mean in Practice? Evaluative Requirements from a Longitudinal Clinical Case Study

Tor Sporsem, Stine Rasdal Finserås, Lars Adde +1

This paper reports a case study on how explainability requirements were elicited during the development of an AI system for predicting cerebral palsy (CP) risk in infants. Over 18…

cs.LG2024★ 10 cited

Choose Your Explanation: A Comparison of SHAP and GradCAM in Human Activity Recognition

Felix Tempel, Daniel Groos, Espen Alexander F. Ihlen +2

Explaining machine learning (ML) models using eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques has become essential to make them more transparent and trustworthy. This is especially important in hi…

cs.CV2024★ 27 cited

Explaining Human Activity Recognition with SHAP: Validating Insights with Perturbation and Quantitative Measures

Felix Tempel, Espen Alexander F. Ihlen, Lars Adde +1

In Human Activity Recognition (HAR), understanding the intricacy of body movements within high-risk applications is essential. This study uses SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)…

cs.CV2024

Evaluating Explainable AI Methods in Deep Learning Models for Early Detection of Cerebral Palsy

Kimji N. Pellano, Inga Strümke, Daniel Groos +2

Early detection of Cerebral Palsy (CP) is crucial for effective intervention and monitoring. This paper tests the reliability and applicability of Explainable AI (XAI) methods usin…